Purpose
Solve non-constant acceleration
problem by both numerical approach and analytical approach. Here is the question.
A 5000-kg elephant on frictionless roller
skates is going 25 m/s when it gets to the bottom of a hill and arrives on level ground. At that point
a rocket mounted on the elephant’s back generates a constant 8000 N thrust
opposite the elephant’s direction of motion. The mass of the rocket changes
with time (due to burning the fuel at a rate of 20 kg/s) so that the m(t)
= 1500 – 20t. Find how far the elephant goes before coming to rest.
Numerical
Approach
1. Put
appropriate values in for Vo and Xo.
2. Set
Δt to be 1 second. Put in the other appropriate values in cell B1 through B4.
(Recall that the force is negative here, since it points in the negative
x-direction.)
3. Input
a formula into cell A9 that will calculate the appropriate time, and that you
can fill down. Use $B$5 in our formula, so the cell doesn't change as I fill
down.
4. Input
a formula into cell B8 that will let me calculate the acceleration at any time.
Fill down
5. In
cell C9 calculate the average acceleration for that first Δt interval.
6. In
cell D9 calculate the change in velocity for that first time interval.
7. In
cell E9 calculate the speed at the end of that time interval.
8. In
cell F9 calculate the average speed at the end of that time interval.
9. In
cell G9 calculate the change in position of the elephant during that time
internal.
10. In
the H9 calculate the position of the elephant.
11. Change the time interval from 1 second to 0.1s
and see if it makes a difference.
12. Change the time interval to 0.05s instead of
0.1s and see if it makes a difference.
So we can derive the
conclusion that if we change the interval from 1s to 0.1s, it makes a huge
difference. But if we change the interval from 0.1s to 0.05s, it makes a quite
small difference.
Questions
1. When
the interval equals to 0.05s, the result of numerical approach approximately
equals to the result of analytical approach.
2. Choose
smaller time interval until the result stops changing. That time interval is
small enough.
3. Using
the numerical approach with a 0.05s interval, the result is 164.0363m.
Comments
Post a Comment